All case studies
Stečaj.rs · Dr Predrag Stojković, insolvency administrator

One year.From 88 to 651 visits.Nothing spent on ads.

Average place in Google results: from 8.4 to 5.3.

The numbers are below
651
search visits in the last 30 days
14.381
times the site showed up on Google
42
pages on the site in total
0 din
spent on ads
In short

The site of insolvency administrator Dr Predrag Stojković went from 88 to 651 monthly visits from Google search in one year, with nothing spent on ads. The average position moved from 8.4 to 5.3. The site has 42 pages, so the growth came not from volume but from each page answering a question people actually search for. The numbers come from Google Search Console.

[ Growth ]

Month by month

88okt172nov200dec219jan255feb349mar456apr413maj315jun455jul522avg65130 dana

The first column is October 2025, the first full month after launch. Before that the site drew about eight visits a month from search. The last point is a 30 day total, from 24 August to 22 September 2026.

[ Before and after ]

What actually changed

October 2025
88
Visits per month
1,535
Impressions per month
8.4
Average place in results
Today
651
Visits per month
14,381
Impressions per month
5.3
Average place in results

Moving from eighth to fifth place sounds minor, but it is the difference between page two and the top of page one. That is where being found is decided.

[ What this would cost ]

The same thing on Google Ads

To bring the same 651 people a month through paid ads, the bill would look like this. Legal searches are expensive, so move the slider to whatever cost per click you consider realistic.

€651
per month
€7.812
per year
€23.436
over three years
Google Ads
€651
This site
€0

That is what the same number of people would cost in ads every month.

Cost per click is not a measurement but your assumption, which is why it sits on a slider. Everything else is measured. The other difference: an ad stops the day you stop paying, an article stays.

[ Foundation ]

The site was first built for machines to understand

In a legal field Google has to know who is speaking, not only what is written. So the invisible layer that proves it came first.

Structured data

Google does not read a site the way a person does. Alongside the visible text there is a layer telling it what is what and who stands behind the text. For legal topics that is decisive.

Illustration
stecaj.rs
Insolvency, reorganisation and owner protection, Dr Predrag Stojković

Expert support for firms in insolvency, reorganisation and compulsory liquidation, protecting owners from personal liability.

comes fromLegalService + WebSite
Licensed insolvency administrator
comes fromPerson + Credential
Novi Sad, SerbiaWeekdays
comes fromPostalAddress + OpeningHours
Insolvency proceedingsReorganisation plansCompulsory liquidationOwner protection
comes fromService ×4

This is what a search result looks like. Everything marked here comes not from the visible text but from that invisible layer.

LegalService + ProfessionalService

This is a legal service, not a news portal and not a listings site

Person

A named person stands behind the content, not an anonymous site

EducationalOccupationalCredential

The administrator's licence is recorded as data, not merely mentioned in prose

GovernmentOrganization

The state body that issued the licence is named too, so the claim can be checked

Service ×4

Every service is described separately, so each competes for its own search

BlogPosting + BreadcrumbList

Every article carries an author, a date and a path, so Google knows where it belongs

PostalAddress + GeoCoordinates

Exact address and coordinates, for searches tied to Novi Sad and the region

AI readiness

People whose company is in trouble increasingly ask ChatGPT or Perplexity rather than Google. Those tools do not browse a site, they read it and retell it, so they need to know whom they are citing.

llms.txt

A file written for AI: who the author is, what the licence is, which services are offered and where

A named author

The articles are not anonymous. On legal questions AI prefers a source with a name and a licence

A score of 100 out of 100

Lighthouse also measures how well an AI agent can read and use a site. This one scores the maximum

robots.txt and sitemap.xml

All 42 pages in one list, so none is left undiscovered

From the llms.txt file, word for word:
Dr Predrag Stojković, licensed insolvency administrator with 20+ years of practice, Novi Sad, Serbia.

Check the same thing for your site

Our AI readiness checker is free and asks for no registration. Enter the address and you get a report.

Open the free check

No registration, no payment, the result appears right away.

[ Readings ]

The site's scores

These are not our scores but Google's Lighthouse tool, measured on a mobile profile on 25 September 2026.

100
SEO
100
AI readability
100
Best practices
91
Accessibility

On Google's own scale anything from 90 up is the green zone. All four scores sit inside it.

184 ms
Main content load
Google asks for under 2.500 ms
0,00
Layout shifting
Google asks for under 0,1
26 ms
Server response
Google asks for under 800 ms

Accessibility is 91, not 100, and we are not hiding it. It loses points on colour contrast, heading order and links that differ from the text only by colour. That goes into the next round.

Do not take our word, check it

Each of these tools is free and none of them is ours. Open them and see what we see.

[ How we work ]

The division of labour, in six steps

Predrag brings twenty years of practice, we bring the structure and the language people actually search in. Neither would work without the other.

  1. The site from the ground up

    A move from the old system to Next.js. Faster loading, a clean structure and addresses that do not change

  2. The real questions

    Topics come from Search Console and from the questions Predrag gets on the phone, not from guesswork

  3. Structure before text

    Every topic gets its own place, so two pages never fight over the same query

  4. He brings the substance, we the shape

    Predrag writes from practice, we handle the title, the order, the subheadings and the search language

  5. Linking and markup

    Internal links to related topics and services, plus schema carrying the author and the licence

  6. Measuring

    Each month we look at which topic grows and which is flat. The next one goes where there is room

  7. And then again, with the next topic

[ Positions ]

Where the site stands today

Average place in Google results, 1 August to 22 September 2026.

01
naplata potraživanja od firme u stečaju
1,2
02
likvidacioni ostatak
1,6
03
razlučno pravo
1,9
04
automatski stečaj
2,5
05
prinudna likvidacija
2,8
06
stečaj firme doo
3,0

These are not generic words but the queries of someone with a concrete problem looking for whom to call.

34%
of people who see the top result click it

For the query about collecting debt from a company in insolvency the site sits at an average place of 1.2, and one in three people who see it open it. That is the query of someone losing money right now.

The same approach can work for you

First we look at what people already search for in your field, then we tell you whether there is room at all.

Book a free analysis

Source for every measured number: Google Search Console, the Stečaj.rs account.